On March 27, 2026, journalist Matt Ford announced that the Daily Mail had permanently deleted an investigative article he co-wrote with Christopher Sharp and Josh Boswell about a CIA crash retrieval program run by the Office of Global Access. The article – one of the most detailed mainstream reports ever published on the alleged program – had been live since November 2023. Now it is gone, with no editorial note, no correction, and no explanation.

Ford’s post on X drew immediate attention: 442 likes, 109 retweets, and dozens of replies asking the obvious question – who ordered it taken down, and why?

What the Article Reported

The original investigation, published November 28, 2023, cited multiple unnamed intelligence sources who described a covert CIA unit within the Science and Technology Directorate that had coordinated the retrieval of crashed UAPs worldwide since 2003. Key claims included:

  • The Office of Global Access had recovered materials from at least nine crash sites
  • Two of the recovered craft were reportedly intact
  • Retrieval operations were carried out by SEAL teams or Delta Force under the Pentagon’s Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC)
  • The CIA’s 24th Special Tactics Squadron secured crash sites and maintained secrecy
  • The program allegedly possessed a detection system capable of tracking UAPs while still cloaked
  • Retrieved materials were transferred to private aerospace contractors rather than kept under military custody – shielding them from government audits and congressional oversight through trade secret protections

The article also cited the career of Douglas Wolfe, a former CIA official whose professional CV referenced helping establish the Office of Global Access in 2003 – one of the few public traces of the program’s existence.

A Pattern of Suppression

The removal did not happen in a vacuum. The UAP journalism space has seen a series of editorial retreats from mainstream outlets that initially published aggressive reporting on the topic.

The New York Times published its landmark 2017 article revealing the Pentagon’s Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP), written by Leslie Kean, Ralph Blumenthal, and Helene Cooper. But the paper’s subsequent coverage has been sporadic and cautious, with internal editorial friction reportedly limiting follow-up investigation.

In February 2026, the mystery deepened when the AARO historical records database was reportedly wiped clean hours after President Trump signed an executive order mandating the release of UAP-related files. Over 3.8 million records vanished from public access.

Now the Daily Mail has joined the pattern – not with cautious follow-up, but with outright deletion.

The Reporters Respond

Matt Ford broke the news on X, tagging his co-authors and Rep. Anna Paulina Luna:

«The Daily Mail has removed the article I co-wrote on the UAP crash retrieval program run by the CIA Office of Global Access.»

The post tagged Josh Boswell, Christopher Sharp, and Rep. Luna – all of whom have been involved in pushing for congressional transparency on crash retrieval allegations.

Sharp, founder and editor of Liberation Times, has published extensively on the Office of Global Access program and was one of the original reporters on the story. Boswell is a senior Daily Mail investigative reporter who has covered UAP for the outlet since 2023.

Neither the Daily Mail nor its parent company, DMG Media, has issued any public statement about the removal.

Why It Matters

The Office of Global Access story was not a fringe blog post. It was published by one of the world’s most-read English-language news websites, co-authored by three journalists with established track records in UAP reporting, and cited multiple intelligence community sources.

Its removal raises questions that go beyond editorial policy:

  • Was the decision made by Daily Mail editors, or was external pressure applied?
  • Does the deletion relate to legal threats, government intervention, or corporate liability concerns?
  • Are other outlets facing similar pressure to remove or suppress UAP investigative reporting?

The timing is notable. The article’s deletion came during the same week that Rep. Eric Burlison confirmed he was touring classified UAP facilities with Pentagon permission, whistleblower Matthew Brown described an ODNI smear campaign against him, and VP Vance acknowledged the administration was “working on” releasing UFO files.

In other words: the story was deleted in the same week that its core claims – that the government possesses recovered UAP materials and is actively managing access to them – received more corroboration than ever.

The Original Article Is Still Accessible

While the Daily Mail has removed the article from its own servers, archived versions remain available through the Wayback Machine and other web archive services. The article’s URL structure (dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12796167/) still resolves, but to an empty or redirected page.

For researchers and journalists, the archived version preserves the full text, images, and sourcing of the original investigation.

Sources